Remember The Dress? Here’s Why We All See Colors Differently

Watch neuroscientist David Eagleman explain how that internet-shattering visual illusion—and others like it—mess with our perception of color.

When The Dress went viral in 2015—driving tens of millions of online onlookers into existential conniptions over whether the garment was blue and black or white and gold—it didn’t just break the internet, it broke color science as researchers had conceived of it up to that point.

Never before had scientists observed such stark differences of opinion over the color of an object. A popular hypothesis for why people saw the dress differently was color constancy—a perceptual phenomenon by which an object appears to stay more or less the same color, regardless of the lighting conditions under which you see it. It’s an incredible feature of human vision, albeit one that researchers have long used against you in the form of visual illusions. Take this photo, for example, which was created by Japanese psychologist Akiyoshi Kitaoka:


The berries look red, right? They’re not. In fact, there are no red pixels in that image. Go ahead, check. Try using your hands or a few sheets of paper to cover everything but a sliver of strawberry. Trippy, right?

As with the dress, color constancy factors into the explanation. But unlike that dress, nearly everyone perceives Kitaoka’s berries as red. There’s no ambiguity, no fervent disagreement, no philosophical fits. Just a captivating deception, and a robust one at that: Even when you know there are no red pixels, you can’t help but see the berries as red.

The Dress illusion was similarly robust. Mostly. People who saw the outfit as blue and black tended to only see it as blue and black. But the dress could also be mercurial. Every once in a while, without warning, the colors a person perceived might switch, triggering still more existential spasms and additional scientific intrigue.

For the latest episode in our series on the science of illusions, we invited Stanford neuroscientist David Eagleman to help us tackle color constancy: how it enables you to see an object’s true color, even in changing light; how it also makes you susceptible to deception; and what researchers think might be going on in viral photos of ambiguous color illusions like The Dress. Or The Shoes. (What? Don’t tell me you haven’t seen The Shoes …)

Robbie Gonzalez is a senior writer at WIRED, covering humanity’s evolving relationship with science and technology. He was previously the editor of WIRED’s design desk. Prior to joining WIRED he was the senior science editor of Gizmodo. Before that, he was a reporter at io9. Gonzalez holds bachelor’s degrees in… 

Source: Wired

Judith Chao Andrade

Apasionada del conocimiento, de compartirlo y de aprender de todo lo que me rodea, disfruto aprendiendo y realizando actividades. Actualmente estoy aprendiendo programación pero me fascinan los temas relacionados con los materiales especiales, las cuiriosidades, el humor, los eventos, las redes sociales ... Mi mayor interés podría decir que es no perder nunca la cuiriosidad por lo que si tienes un plan en mente solo proponlo !.

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *